The rule we have quoted refers specifically to actions taken against wallbots, and we fully understand how it is intended to be used. We have two hypothetical situations regarding partners and <G11>, though, and how referees are supposed to make calls.
The blue robot is pinning the red wallbot, which is indirectly pinning Red Robot 1. Would the blue robot be considered to be pinning Red Robot 1, or does the lack of protection carry over?
The blue robot is pushing the red wallbot such that the other red robot is “restricted … into a small, confined area of the field, approximately the size of one foam field tile or less” and, because it is preventing the wallbot from moving, “has not provided an avenue for escape.” Would the blue robot be considered to be trapping the red robot?