Answered: Clarification on <SG9>

[DracoTheDragon]

If an easily removed robot surrounds the plate between the high goals on 4 sides in an attempt to de-score an opposing alliance’s stack of sacks on the opposite side of the field, would this violate <SG9>.

<SG9> Robots may not intentionally grasp, grapple or attach to any Field Elements. Violations of this
rule will result in a Disqualification.

If the robot maintains this state at the end of the match, Referees/Drivers will be able to remove the robot without changing the state of any mechanisms.

[Karthik]

@DracoTheDragon

If an easily removed robot surrounds the plate between the high goals on 4 sides in an attempt to de-score an opposing alliance’s stack of sacks on the opposite side of the field, would this violate <SG9>.

If the robot maintains this state at the end of the match, Referees/Drivers will be able to remove the robot without changing the state of any mechanisms.

Please take a look at the new version of <SG9> which was updated today:

https://vexforum.com/showpost.php?p=308254&postcount=5

@VEX Sack Attack Game Manual

<SG9> Robots may not intentionally grasp, grapple or attach to any Field Elements. Strategies with mechanisms that react against multiple sides of a field element in an effort to latch onto said field element are prohibited. (See figures 8-10) The intent of this rule is to prevent teams from both unintentionally damaging the field, and from anchoring themselves to the field. Violations of this rule will result in a Disqualification.

From what you’ve described, it seems that your robot would be surrounding a field element in a way that would constitute grasping and would violate <SG9>. Thus it would be illegal. However, without seeing your exact implementation it’s impossible to issue a blanket ruling.

[DracoTheDragon]

I do not have an image sharing website to post any photos unfortunately i would think there is a possibility of field damage if another robot interacts with us in this position. Thus, violating “unintentionally damaging the field” portion of <SG9>.

Thank you for the help:)

[Karthik]

@DracoTheDragon

I do not have an image sharing website to post any photos unfortunately i would think there is a possibility of field damage if another robot interacts with us in this position. Thus, violating “unintentionally damaging the field” portion of <SG9>.

Thank you for the help:)

You’re welcome.