I have a question regarding SG8 and the “pushing/plowing” and “concave” implications from the definition of “possessing:”
Possessing – A Robot is considered to be Possessing a Scoring Object if it is carrying, holding, or controlling the movement of any Scoring Object(s) in the Robot. Pushing/plowing Scoring Objects is not considered Possession, however using concave portions of your Robot to control the movement of Balls is considered Possession.
<SG8> Robots may not Possess more than four (4) Scoring Objects at once.
I’m wondering if the intent of the possession rule in Nothing But Net is similar to the possessing rule from Toss Up:
So my questions regarding Nothing But Net:
The Nothing But Net definition says that pushing/plowing is not possessing. Suppose a robot is carrying multiple preloads or match loads, and then drives through a stack of balls and pushes those balls into the low goal, and then proceeds to score the preloads/match loads. In this scenario the team has clearly developed a scoring strategy that involves pushing the balls to the low goal, i.e., pushing them to a desired location. If the total number of balls being carried by the robot and being pushed by the robot to the low goal exceeds four balls, should this be considered a violation of <SG8> along the same line of reasoning as Toss Up (“intentionally pushing or impelling BuckyBall(s) to a desired location”)?
If this strategy is a violation of <SG8>, does it matter if the front of the robot is concave or not? For example, a simple straight edge on the front of the robot would be sufficient to implement the above described pushing strategy.