Answered: Possession Clarification

The definition of Possession says that:

could you clarify the definition of “in the Robot”? Does this allow the Robot to hold onto one cone with a bunch of cones stacked on top that are not “in the Robot”?

Thank you

If a Robot is holding on to one Cone, while there are Cones fully or partially nested upon it, the Robot would be in possession of all of those Cones. So the situation you’ve described would be an example of Possessing multiple Cones and would be a violation of <SG9>.