Answered: Stack on a touched mobile goal

[physics_smith]

We had a situation come up today where at the end of a practice match, one robot was touching their mobile goal that had cones on it. The argument was that the cones were not counted because of the robot touching the mobile goal. I decided that the cones did count, and here was my logic:
Starting with the definition of scored.

Scored – A Mobile Goal is Scored in a Goal Zone if it meets all of the following criteria:

1. The Mobile Goal is touching the Goal Zone
   a. If a Mobile Goal is touching multiple Goal Zones it is Scored in the higher point value Goal Zone
2. 2. The Mobile Goal is not touching a Robot of the same color Alliance.
3. 3. The Mobile Goal and the Goal Zone belong to the same Alliance.

And the the note on the definition of stacked.

Note 1: Cones still count as being Stacked even if the Mobile Goal that they are Stacked on is not Scored.
Note 2: By these definitions, if a Robot is touching a Cone on a Mobile Goal, that Cone and any above it will not count as being Stacked.

So the mobile goal was not scored, but the stack counted. Is this correct?
The counterargument is that any cone above where one was touched does not count, but that section does not mention mobile goals being touched.

[VEX_GDC]

This interpretation is correct, provided that the robot was only contacting the Mobile Goal, not any of the Cones above it. If it were in a Scoring Zone, the Mobile Goal would not have counted as Scored - but this does not have any bearing on any Cones that are Stacked on the Mobile Goal.

If the robot was contacting any Cones above the Mobile Goal, then that Cone and any above it would not have counted as Stacked. However, the Mobile Goal itself is not a Cone.