Answered: Would incidental adjustment of a skyrise section be considered carrying?

[FullMetalMentor]

The rules define carry as this: Carry – The act of a robot intentionally controlling the motion and or position of a Skyrise Section.

However, I can imagine an autonomous robot might not get its first skyrise section perfectly in place. Next, it might go get a second skyrise section, which it then tries to place on the first skyrise. The resulting action of moving the second skyrise onto the first might then cause the first skyrise section to finally plunk into its proper position.

Would this be a violation of the carry rule? Or would this be considered a non-violation because it is deemed unintentional?

[Karthik]

@FullMetalMentor

The rules define carry as this: Carry – The act of a robot intentionally controlling the motion and or position of a Skyrise Section.

However, I can imagine an autonomous robot might not get its first skyrise section perfectly in place. Next, it might go get a second skyrise section, which it then tries to place on the first skyrise. The resulting action of moving the second skyrise onto the first might then cause the first skyrise section to finally plunk into its proper position.

Would this be a violation of the carry rule? Or would this be considered a non-violation because it is deemed unintentional?

This would not be considered Carrying of multiple Skyrise Sections.