Usually I would assume “at least,” but the fact that the previous two contained it and this one did not makes me question.
7 Likes
Can you explain your question with more detail? I don’t understand your question.
3 of your color rings need to be scored, spread across a minimum of 2 stakes (i assume this includes wall stakes)
Both robots need to leave the starting area (neither can be behind or touching the white line)
One of the robots need to be touching the ladder.
Hope this helps!
The question here is that usually, it would say “at least one Robot contacting the Ladder” instead of “one Robot contacting the Ladder”, which implies that you do not get the AWP if both robots are contacting it.
1 Like
I think he means If more than one robot can be touching the ladder, and I would think yes, but I’m also a bit confused why it doesn’t clarify in the rule.
I think the confusion of it comes from it specifying only one robot touching the ladder. For 1 and 2, it says ‘at least.’ In 4, it says just ‘one,’ which i think makes it seem like only a single robot touching the ladder would get you AWP.
I don’t think it matters if one or both robots touch the ladder, though.
2 Likes
Pretty sure this is where “use common sense” comes into play. Pretty sure the GDC wouldn’t want to penalize teams that “do more” than required
2 Likes
cool that makes more sense
gdc fix!111!
I think they with make a fix to this in the next manual update