New Excellence Criteria, looking at the numbers from MOA event

[sankeydd]

Of the teams that played at MOA, only the following 8 teams were eligible for the Excellence Criteria by being the top 30% for driver, programming, and teamwork. They are sorted by their teamwork rank as that was the primary sort in my spreadsheet.

Name	Driver Rank	Programming Rank	Teamowrk Rank
229V - ACE Robotics - Won Excellence	1	1	1
19589A - Hope Robotics	10	4	2
6008C - C U Later	20	10	6
94W - WInnovators	14	19	7
1469A - It Is What It Is	3	7	9
5203G - Gremlin	7	2	13
5062X - XenoFox	18	17	24
2775V - Jackson Area Robotics	30	29	26

[Mentor_355U]

I’m curious (and admittedly have not RTFM) - how did you calculate the Teamwork Rank?

[9MotorGang]

Jackson area robotics (2775V) was not considered for excellence at MOA. This is because only 87 teams ran skills. And 0.3*87 is 26. Since they were 28th they were outside the top 30% of teams who ran skills.

[RoboCatz]

Looks like it’s just the event rankings.

Seems like @ sankeydd just got his terms mixed up.

[lacsap]

@Mentor_355U

I’m curious (and admittedly have not RTFM) - how did you calculate the Teamwork Rank?

It is likely the qualification ranking as specified in updated criteria for Excellence.

[sankeydd]

@RoboCatz

Seems like @ sankeydd just got his terms mixed up.

Yup, I’ve got VEX IQ brain.

@9MotorGang

Jackson area robotics (2775V) was not considered for excellence at MOA. This is because only 87 teams ran skills. And 0.3*87 is 26. Since they were 28th they were outside the top 30% of teams who ran skills.

Nope, it’s 30% of the total teams.

From: Excellence Eligibility criteria : Robot Events

Teams that have not run skills should be considered as having a score of zero for ranking purposes.