OPR is a way of estimating the number of points a team scores for its alliance in each match (read more here). I thought that comparing skills scores to OPR could be a smart way to quickly identify skills results that might not be accurate, so I decided to redo Quadcopter’s analysis for all skills results instead of just the top few.
3560Y is on the Worlds team list, and I believe Canadian robot skills slots are the only way they could have qualified. So this score is worth taking a closer look at.
EDIT: People have posted in this thread to say that yes, 3560Y qualified through Canadian robot skills based on this score.
Note the 1-attempt score of 43 by 3560Y. This is also the same score that 4659A got. One possibility is that this score was mistakenly entered for both teams, when only 4659A actually scored 43 points.
The important line is the blue one, which is their OPR. It hasn’t gone above 8 at any event this season (so their average number of points scored for their alliance per match probably hasn’t gone above 8 this season). They have only attempted skills at two events: the St Catharine’s event, and an earlier event where they scored 15 points.
I have some videos of 3560Y’s robot. First, from the St Catherine’s Qualifier, where the 43-point skills score was recorded (3560Y starts on the red autoloader tile):
3560Y scores 0 points.
Then two from the Ontario Provincial Championship one month after the St Catherine’s event:
Q20 - 3560Y scores two cubes on posts for 6 points
Q48 - 3560Y scores two cubes. Both of these are descored by one blue robot in the last 30 seconds of driver control.
So we know that at the competition where they recorded a 43-point skills score, 3560Y was a very unstable scissor lift that scored very few points per match. At the Provincial Championship the robot no longer had a skyrise manipulator, presumably because the one they had at St Catherine’s didn’t work.
Based on the above information that I’ve been able to gather about the robot’s performance, I think it’s probable that 3560Y didn’t actually score 43 points in skills at the St Catharine’s event, and I think the most likely explanation is that the score from 4659A was accidentally recorded twice.
Someone from RECF should be able to see in the results from this event how many of the points in 3560Y’s 43 point skills run came from each of skyrise sections, skyrise cubes, post cubes, post ownership points and floor goals. If RECF doesn’t have this information, then the event partner for the St Catharine’s event will have it (in the tournament manager database from this tournament - load the database into Tournament Manager, right click, 'Edit Score"). If the database shows that the point distribution for 3560Y’s 43-point run was the same as the point distribution for 4659A’s 43-point run, then that’s very suspicious.
EDIT: RECF and the event partner will also be able to see the time at which the runs were entered. If they’re consecutive, with 4659A before 3560Y, then that makes it more likely that 3560Y’s score was mistakenly entered.
I strongly believe that RECF should look into whether this score is genuine (by checking the score distributions and timestamps of the two 43-point scores). I’m from New Zealand, though, so it would be more useful if people from Canada who know this team or were at this event could contribute any information. Was this a genuine score? Is this a score that 3560Y would realistically be capable of? Is there an explanation for 3560Y’s apparently poor match performance given their recorded skills score of 43?
EDIT: this post is based on my own observations and opinions. It is not intended to represent the opinions of AURA, anyone else in New Zealand, or anyone else other than me.