55 watt drivetrain cad design

VEX V5 Robotics Competition
1

Hello all,

I would like feedback on my drivetrain (6 motor, chaining 2 11 watt and 1 5.5 watt together)

Because of the 55W motor restriction, I designed it with:

  • 4 x 11W (running at 200 rpm) motors and 2 x 5.5W motors

  • 5:3 gear ratio

  • 2 omni wheels and 1 traction wheel per side (all 3.25")

The current CAD is not completely finalized, I plan to add at least one more brace when I build it, but I’d like feedback on the design as it currently stands.

Some specific areas I’m interested in hearing about:

  • Potential structural weaknesses

  • Voltage control through PID - is it reliable? how hard is it to program? do the motors heat up fast?

  • Weight distribution and traction

  • Motor usage and efficiency under the 55W limit

  • Anything that might become a problem during competitions

CAD Link:
https://cad.onshape.com/documents/4511146c06a0cc33b71b39df/w/e8ac20f284140942154b4b32/e/6eedf5e65be94f9f1d57aee0?renderMode=0&uiState=6a2776987076ae745261eecd

Thanks!

2

I like the cad and am glad you acknowledged the need for another brace or two!, I also just want to potentially propse to you, how you are going to make sure your drive is squared well, whether that be through structural screwjoints, standoffs, shoulder screws etc!

3

  1. i would move this cross brace forwards and then brace across back with standofs triangle and then 3wide across back verticaly. make sure to triagle brace it as well.

    image
    image698×628 113 KB

    1. this isnt gonna work im guessing you just screwed up your mates…

    image
    image1045×793 135 KB

  2. change all non motor shafts to structural screw joints will help with friction and stiffness of your drive pod.

    image
    image1581×627 191 KB

  3. all shafts that have a motor on them dont need a bearing on the motor side. this is called flat mounting. you dont need this bearing because the shaft already alligns to the motor cartrige so its constrained by the motor and if you do have the bearing then you cause mis alignment between the motor and that inside bearing increasing friction. KEEP THE ONES ON THE OUTSIDE only remove the ones on the motor side.

image
image741×707 112 KB

4

I suggest you learn Dead Axle, then redo your cad base on what third floor said.

It reliable if you did everything correct.

As an engineer, there will come a day when you need to learn it.

Ploss=n*W

Ploss=Calorific value

W=power(watt)

Lowering the center of gravity makes the machine less likely to tip over, for example, placing the air tank very low.

5

thank you, but what do you mean by squared well? like reducing friction or making sure everything is parallel

6

this doesnt show up for me in the design

7

could you explain this a little more in depth?

8

okay thank you, but how would you triangle brace it

9

go search Copper Loss

10

this is from one of my previouse robots.

image
image406×527 77.9 KB

11

A few things:

  1. When you have a shaft in a motor, only use one bearing. Any more will add friction.
  2. Use screw joints for gears/wheels that aren’t connected to motors. This will reduce warping over time and reduce friction
  3. Add more bracing. You want at least 1 full cross brace and at least 2 partial braces, as well as bring on the ends of the drive channels.
  4. This is a super wide drivetrain, so you may want to reduce it to save weight. It’s fine if you can justify this decision, but I don’t recommend it.