oh ok
iejfijesfiesj-iggone
The only intake I wouldnāt want to use personally would be the rubber bands just in case the disc gets caught in there or they and how slow it is compatible with the flex wheel intake. But then again the other intakes were using 600 rpm motors. I have no knowledge of the third intake so Iām not going to comment. But the flywheel intake is more space-consuming and is easier to use with bigger bots, but it really just depends on whatever design bests fits your intentions for the bot.
This should be in cursed images
This seeems pretty crazy
You can solve this with an intake like this
Oh yeah I have the CAD files of this and a bunch of other robots I frgt about them.
Do you mean disco bot?
Better not tell taranā¦
(About the flex treads)
My main question now is that why the flex wheels are better? Compared to most of the other types of intakes since most people said flexwheel. My only idea why the flexwheels seems to be better beucase they are more grippy.
They also compress well
Grippy, compress well, and the various sizes and durometers make it easy to tune your intake
What are the other reasons on why the other intakes arenāt as good comapred to the flex wheel? For example the rubber band intake might be bad becuaseā¦
Try it and seeā¦thereās no substitute for direct experience.
We canāt becuase we donāt have all the parts right now. But I already found out the answer to this.