Answered: 5 Point Zone Defensive Actions

[VEX_GDC]

In the future, please quote the relevant rule from the manual in your question, per the Q&A guidelines. SG5 is quoted below for reference:

<SG5> Robots may not intentionally or accidentally, indirectly or directly, remove Cones from an opponent’s Stack (i.e. Cones that are fully nested on an opponent’s upright Goal).

a. A Robot that accidentally knocks over an opponent’s Goal, causing Cones to be removed, would be in violation of this rule. Teams should exercise extreme caution when interacting with or around opponent Goals.

Minor violations of this rule that do not affect the match will result in a warning. Match Affecting offenses will result in a Disqualification. Teams that receive multiple warnings may also receive a Disqualification at the Head Referee’s discretion.

Next, please see the following Q&A posts and the Q&A Summary to better understand how defensive interactions in the 5 Point Zone should be handled. (SG10, G12, and G13 are quoted in these posts, for reference):

Answered: Definition of the 10 Point Zone

Answered: Blocking Opponents from Entering Zones

Now, these questions mostly ask about SG10, not descoring Cones (SG5), but the principle is largely the same. In general, the only time an offensive robot would be at fault when attempting to score in their own offensive zone is if they were clearly acting solely in the interest of “drawing a penalty” (G13).

Additionally, SG5 is clear that any intentional or accidental, direct or indirect action that removes an opponent’s Cones would be considered a violation. Teams are advised to be cautious when attempting purely defensive strategies such as the one you are describing.

So, yes, this hypothetical interaction would likely be considered a violation of SG5 by the red alliance. If it was Match Affecting, then a DQ would be issued.